TRIGLY-X STARVATION EXPERIMENT FORMULA

This formula was developed for a starvation study by a group of scientists researching body fat loss. Everything indicates that it was used for the “Starvation Experiment in Minnesota, United States” (1944).

The formula was kept secret during the experiment and was also not disclosed in subsequent reports. However, some time later, in an unknown way, the formula was leaked from the saved files of the experiment and later it was replicated for new studies related to the loss of body fat. In this way, TRIGLY-X is created.

In the first experiment, human studies were conducted where some volunteers ended up with anorexia, starvation and extreme thinness changing their eating behavior forever. The details of this experiment were not published until years later. The extreme starvation and fat loss of the participants is believed to have resulted from administering the TRIGLY-X formula. Until today the information about its creation is unknown and it is only known that the formula is really effective in eliminating body fat. It should be taken with extreme caution and responsibility, strictly following the directions on the package. CAUTION: DO NOT LEAVE IN REACH OF CHILDREN.

THE EFFECT OF (L-) CARNITINE ON WEIGHT LOSS IN ADULTS

Clinical evidence which investigated the effects of l-carnitine, a vitamin-like substance, on weight loss had led to inconsistent results. This study therefore aimed to examine the effect of l-carnitine supplementation on body weight and composition by including the maximum number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and to conduct a dose-response analysis, for the first time.

Methods and results: Online databases were searched up to January 2019. In total, 37 RCTs (with 2292 participants) were eligible. Meta-analysis showed that l-carnitine supplementation significantly decreased body weight [Weighted mean difference (WMD) = -1.21 kg, 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.73, -0.68; P < 0.001], body mass index (BMI) (WMD = -0.24 kg/m2, 95% CI: -0.37, -0.10; P = 0.001), and fat mass (WMD = -2.08 kg, 95% CI: -3.44, -0.72; P = 0.003). No significant effect was seen for waist circumference (WC) and body fat percent. The meta-analysis of high-quality RCTs only confirmed the effect on body weight. A non-linear dose-response association was seen between l-carnitine supplementation and body weight reduction (P < 0.001) suggesting that ingestion of 2000 mg l-carnitine per day provides the maximum effect in adults. This association was not seen for BMI, WC and body fat percent.

L-carnitine is an amino acid, it’s actually more of a vitamin-like substance that plays a number of roles in your body.  It’s formed in your liver and kidneys and made from two essential amino acids (lysine and methionine). Some medical professionals prescribe L-carnitine in supplement form to help support those with heart conditions, diabetes, erectile dysfunction, and other health conditions. But because of its role in fat metabolism, it’s best known for its ability to aid in weight loss, particularly when combined with a healthy diet and exercise routine.

L-carnitine plays an essential role in the transportation of fats to the mitochondria, where they’re converted to energy. There’s a whole lot of science to it, of course, but to keep it simple, we’ll put it this way: L-carnitine could very well be the answer to your weight loss dreams. Take a look below at 5 benefits of L-carnitine weight loss supplement and how it can help you shed pounds both directly and indirectly.

1. L-carnitine burns fat

With higher levels of L-carnitine, your body becomes more efficient at burning fat. Not only does this decrease the amount of fat that your body stores, but it also helps reduce visceral belly fat, the kind that surrounds your vital organs and potentially leads to fatty liver disease and other serious health conditions.

2. More energy during and after a workout

As your body’s capacity for fat-burning rises, so does your energy level. L-carnitine not only helps you increase the amount of fat burned with every workout, but you also get more energy for better workouts and an active lifestyle.

3. L-carnitine boosts your metabolism to help you lose weight

Taking that energy increase into your exercise routine will allow you to perform with more intensity, providing a boost to your metabolism. A more efficient metabolism significantly aids your weight loss program because you’ll increase the amount of calories you’re able to burn—even at rest.

4. Enhanced recovery from an L-carnitine injection

L-carnitine helps reduce the buildup of lactic acid in your muscles.  Muscle lactate buildup is responsible for pain and muscle fatigue after an intense workout. L-carnitine helps clear out the lactate so you recover more quickly and can get back to that fat-melting exercise that’s so central to your weight loss program.

5. L-carnitine aids the body’s immune system

In addition to the fat-burning and weight loss benefits of L-carnitine, it also aids the body’s immune system and functions as an effective antioxidant as well.  How does this connect to your weight loss program? Easy: The better you feel, the more likely you are to put on your gym clothes on and get your body moving.

It’s important to note that L-carnitine will not help you burn fat or lose weight if you don’t combine it with a healthy diet and exercise routine. If you’ve already established a healthy routine, but it doesn’t seem to be helping you shed pounds, L-carnitine lipotropic injections might be just what you need to help increase the impact of the work you’re already doing.

Conclusions: l-carnitine supplementation provides a reducing effect on body weight, BMI and fat mass, especially among adults with overweight/obesity.

Reference: Effects of l-carnitine supplementation on weight loss and body composition: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 37 randomized controlled clinical trials with dose-response analysis. Nasir Talenezhad, Mohammad Mohammadi, Nahid Ramezani-Jolfaie, Hassan Mozaffari-Khosravi, Amin Salehi-Abargouei. 10.1016/j.clnesp.2020.03.008.

THE STARVATION EXPERIMENT

To inform treatment, mental health providers often like to discuss research findings with their patients. It offers an opportunity for individuals to understand a providers reasoning for using a particular modality while eliciting change. For the treatment of eating disorders in particular, Garner (1997) recommends providing information from research or psychoeducation to individuals with eating disorders. It is suggested to be a core component of eating disorder treatment because it can act as a source of motivation and reduce defensiveness in patients (Garner, Rockert, Olmsted, Johnson, & Coscina, 1985). One of the most prominent studies used as a source of psychoeducation in eating disorder treatment is the Minnesota Starvation Study by Keys et al. (1950). Not only did it provide a wealth of knowledge about the psychological and physiological effects of starvation, a key component in anorexia nervosa, but it also offered insight into the rehabilitation/refeeding process. Discussing these findings helps our patients and providers understand the process of restrictive eating and how to implement adaptive refeeding. 

Origin 

During this time in history, starvation and other forced atrocities were occurring throughout Europe in World War II. It was clear there would be a critical need for a large-scale relief feeding (Keys et. al, 1950). As a consultant to the War Department and a professor of physiology at the University of Minnesota, Ancel Keys sought to explore how individuals would be affected physiologically and psychologically by a limited diet. Additionally and most importantly, he wanted to identify how he could best help these individuals in the refeeding process to provide postwar rehabilitation.  

What is the Minnesota Starvation Study? 

In November 1944, physiologist, Ancel Keys, and psychologist, Josef Brozek, conducted a study at the University of Minnesota to identify the best type of rehabilitation diet for individuals who had experienced starvation. In order to test types of refeeding, the researchers first had to conduct a study on semi-starvation. This additional exploration provided information about the effects of semi-starvation on the mind and body and offered significant insight into symptoms related to anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa.  

Recruitment Process 

To conduct this research, Keys et al. (1950) recruited thirty-six young, healthy men to participate in this almost year-long study. This was a difficult task due to many young men serving in the military at the time. Fortunately, there was a group of young men assigned to the Civilian Public Service in the United States and Keys received approval from the War Department to recruit from this sample. In order to participant in the study, individuals had to meet the following criteria: Must be in good physical and mental health; must be able to get along reasonably well with others; and must have a true interest in relief and rehabilitation. In order to have optimal motivation and cooperation in the study, the researchers believed that the participants needed to have a personal sense of responsibility in improving the nutritional status of famine victims. 

Study Activities 

Throughout the entire study, participants worked on tasks in the laboratory and were allowed to take university classes and participate in university activities.  Each participant was required to keep a personal journal of their daily lives within the study. The participants’ basic functions, body weight, size, and strength were recorded regularly. They were given psychomotor and endurance tests as they walked or ran on treadmills in their laboratory as well as intelligence and personality measures from psychologists (Keys et al., 1950). 

Phases 

The experiment was conducted in the following way: The first 12-weeks was a control period, the next 24 weeks involved semi-starvation, and the last 12-weeks involved controlled rehabilitation. An additional 8 weeks of unrestricted rehabilitation was held for twelve of the subjects. For 8 to 12 months following the starvation recovery, the study conducted follow-up examinations.  

During the first three months, the researchers observed and collected data about their participants’ normal eating behaviors. The participants ate food provided by a full-time cook and two assistants under the supervision of a trained dietitian. Each individual’s meals were adjusted to their body size in order to maintain caloric balance. They consumed around 3500 calories of food per day and were determined to have had an appropriate amount of nutrients and vitamins. 

For the following six months, the men’s diets were restricted to half of their normal intake to reflect the conditions of war in Europe. They were served two meals a day and ate approximately 1570 calories a day. As a result, they lost approximately 25% of their weight.  

For the final three months of the study, participants were refed and rehabilitated. They were divided into 4 groups and refed with different caloric amounts starting at a low quantity. A small group of subjects stayed for an additional 8 weeks and were fed an unrestricted diet. During those first two weeks of the unrestricted diet, each participant was allowed to choose their own meals and consequently ate between 7,000-10,000 calories per day.  

Results and Observations 

After reviewing and analyzing the data collected throughout the baseline, starvation period, and refeeding/rehabilitation period, notable changes were observed in physical, psychological, behavioral, and social aspects of the volunteers’ lives. Not only had the participants’ bodies’ gone through physical changes, but their psychological well-being had been impacted. 

Cognitive Differences. First, Keys et al. (1950) noticed a significant difference in the themes of the participants’ cognitions. Compared to the start of the study, the participants were far more preoccupied with food. Food and eating became focal points in conversations, reading, dreams, and even daydreams. For example, when they watched movies, the study’s participants were recorded commenting on the frequency of food and eating mentioned. Some volunteers developed concentration issues due to their preoccupation with food. Additionally, their interest in food expanded into new habits of reading cookbooks and collecting recipes (Garner & Garfinkel, 1985). Three participants even changed their occupations to reflect their extreme interest in eating and food: Three became chefs and one went into the agriculture field (Keys et al., 1950). 

Eating Changes. Second, Keys et al. (1950) observed changes in the participant’s baseline behavior. During mealtimes, participants were recorded becoming possessive over their food. Worried that others may try to eat their meals, they would guard their food defensively with their elbows. At meal times, participants were recorded eating all the food on their plates to the “last crumb” and “licking” their plates clean. Some even became upset when non-participants in the cafeteria “wasted” food.  

Moreover, those that enjoyed gum started chewing to excess. Gum-chewing became a health concern due to participants “rapidly” chewing 2-3 sticks at a time until their mouths became sore. The researchers had to place a cap on gum packages chewed per day to two. Others developed tobacco-smoking habits because it provided some relief from the hunger they experienced during the semi-starvation phase. 

During the rehabilitative phase, more eating behaviors developed. Men started eating “several” meals in one sitting and developed gastrointestinal upset and headaches as a result. They experienced difficulties in reading their own hunger cues. Participants described feeling hungrier and using binge-eating and purging behaviors during the refeeding period. Even after five-months of refeeding, they continued to use these behaviors and developed body image concerns. 

Behavioral and Personality Changes. Many were observed collecting food-themed items and even rummaging through garbage to find food. The participants developed an extreme distaste for wasting food. Such behaviors have been observed in individuals with anorexia nervosa (Crisp, Hsu, Harding, & Hartshorn, 1980). Similarly, participants used methods to create the illusion that they had more food on their plates than in reality. They started “toying” with their food, cutting it into small pieces, and making their meal consumption last for hours, which previously would have lasted minutes. There was also a remarkable increase in the use of spices and salt to add flavor to meals. Moreover, participants who had been mostly extraverted in their social life, became isolated and described themselves as feeling socially inadequate. Keys et al. (1950) also reported a decrease in the sex drive and interest of their volunteers. 

Emotional Changes. During the semi-starvation and the rehabilitative phases, participants were recorded developing new anxiety and depressive symptoms not present at the beginning of the study. Using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), Keys et al. (1950) recorded significant increases on the Hysteria, Hypochondriasis, and Depression scales indicating increased anxiety related to somatic concerns and depressive symptoms. Especially during the semi-starvation period, some participants endorsed becoming more sensitive and argumentative with others. Over the first 6 weeks of the rehabilitation period, many men reported feeling even more depressed than the semi-starvation phase; especially those individuals in the rehabilitation group that were fed less calories in the beginning of the phase to test refeeding strategies. Keys et al. (1950) remarked that the only times these participants showed positive emotional reactions were in response to discussing their weight, food, or hunger. 

Physical Observations. Lastly, the participants’ physical changes throughout the experiment were significant. Not only had the participants’ weight changed during the different stages of the study, they started to experience new issues with gastrointestinal discomfort, dizziness, headaches, decreased need for sleep, edema, hair loss, and cold intolerance. Even their basal metabolic rate (BMR), or amount of energy in calories the body requires at rest, changed depending on the stage of the study. By the end of the semi-starvation period, the volunteers’ BMRs had decreased by 40% from their baselines. Keys et al. (1950) suggested that this was due to the low caloric intake which reduced the body’s need for energy. Additionally, in the semi-starvation period, the volunteers’ weight dropped by 25% and their muscle mass decreased by 40%.  

What does this all mean? 

Keys et al. (1950) originally explored optimal methods for the refeeding of individuals following starvation. In order to do so, the researchers had to conduct a study in which healthy participants were voluntarily semi-starved. As a result, Keys et al. (1950) discovered a wealth of knowledge pertaining to the detrimental effects of starvation and restriction to physical and psychological functioning. The men in this study were healthy physically and psychologically at the beginning of the experiment. Following semi-starvation, the participants developed symptoms similar to those of anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge-eating disorder.  

Understanding the findings from this study is important for several reasons. First, it may provide insights into why starvation may be reinforcing for some individuals. The description of the experience of extreme caloric restriction sounds aversive. Yet, it is possible that the food preoccupation that accompanies extreme caloric depletion is reinforcing in the sense that the individual struggling thinks less about other things that may be stressful – but seemingly less in the individuals’ “control.” In this way, the starvation of anorexia nervosa is functioning as a distraction or avoidance behavior. At the same time, this preoccupation may give individuals with anorexia nervosa the mistaken impression that there is not much that constitutes who they are other than restricting food – thereby making the prospect of recovery quite scary. Thus, understanding that this is an artifact of starvation can be very hope producing. Second, it may help parents have a greater understanding of some of the perplexing and sometimes frustrating behaviors that arise during the course of meal management (e.g., slow eating, shredding food). By appreciating that these are adaptations of starvation rather than overt acts of defiance, parents may be in a better position to understand the behaviors of their children.  

In summary, this study suggests that the act of restriction and extreme dieting impacts an individual’s physical, social, behavioral, and psychological well-being. To this day, the Minnesota Starvation Study is considered one of the most critical pieces of psychoeducation to share in the treatment of eating disorders.

By Chantal Gil, PsyD

References 

Crisp, A. H., Hsu, L. K. G., Harding, B., & Hartshorn, J. (1980). Clinical features of anorexia nervosa: A study of a consecutive series of 102 female patients. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 24(3), 179-191. 

Garner, D. M. (1997). Psychoeducational principles in treatment. In D. M. Garner & P. E. Garfinkel (Eds.), Handbook of treatment for eating disorders (pp. 147-177). New York, NY, US: The Guilford Press. 

Garner, D. M., & Garfinkel, P. E. (1985). Handbook of psychotherapy for anorexia nervosa and bulimia. Guilford Press. 

Kalm, L. M., & Semba, R. D. (2005). They starved so that others be better fed: remembering Ancel Keys and the Minnesota experiment. The Journal of nutrition, 135(6), 1347-1352. 

Keys, A., Brozek, J., Henshel, A., Mickelson, O., & Taylor, H.L. (1950). The biology of human starvation, (Vols. 1–2). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Tucker, T. (2007). The great starvation experiment: Ancel Keys and the men who starved for science.Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. 

TRIGLY-X
TRIGLY-X
TRIGLY-X
TRIGLY-X
TRIGLY-X
TRIGLY-X
TRIGLY-X
TRIGLY-X
TRIGLY-X
TRIGLY-X
TRIGLY-X
previous arrowprevious arrow
next arrownext arrow
TRIGLY-X
TRIGLY-X
TRIGLY-X
TRIGLY-X
TRIGLY-X
TRIGLY-X
TRIGLY-X
TRIGLY-X
TRIGLY-X
TRIGLY-X
TRIGLY-X
previous arrow
next arrow

THE LEADERS OF THE MINNESOTA STARVATION EXPERIMENT

Many of us will be stuffing ourselves silly from Thanksgiving to New Year’s Day.

But 70 years ago at this time, three dozen young men assembled in a laboratory under the football stadium at the University of Minnesota campus to do something quite different.

They were going to starve themselves for science and humanity.

The men had volunteered for what now is known as the Minnesota Starvation Experiment, a groundbreaking study that was conducted by U of M physiologist Ancel Keys.

Keys already had gained fame for developing the K ration, the portable food packet carried by paratroopers and other GIs in combat during World War II.

After the war, Keys would appear on the cover of Time magazine for establishing a link between saturated fat and heart disease and promoting the Mediterranean diet as a solution.

Recruiting conscientious objectors

But while WWII was still raging and the Allies slowly were grinding their way toward victory, Keys worked on a different problem: how to best feed starving people in newly liberated, occupied and war-torn countries.

Keys’ answer was an exhaustive, year-long experiment that would subject humans to “semi-starvation” in laboratory conditions. Then he would document how the test subjects responded to recovery diets.

The test subjects were recruited from the ranks of conscientious objectors who opposed being drafted into the military. They were pacifists who refused to kill for their country but who were willing to sacrifice themselves to help others.

For six months, the men went hungry. They became emaciated to the point that they resembled concentration camp survivors. Some went a little nuts.

The test subjects became obsessed with food. They collected cookbooks, recipes and kitchen gadgets and had nightmares about cannibalism. They lost interest in sex and became depressed, antisocial, lethargic and irritable.

When they went to the movies, they were most interested in the scenes when the actors were eating.

“I think for the first time, I read Proust because he had something to say about the joys of partaking in food,” said Daniel Peacock, 95, one of perhaps two or three of the original 36 starvation experiment subjects still alive.

“They kind of looked at food with an almost pornographic preoccupation,” said Todd Tucker, who wrote a book about the study, “The Great Starvation Experiment.”

The test subjects developed bizarre eating rituals and were tempted to eat garbage. They berated people who wasted food. Until the experimenters restricted it, one man chewed up to 40 packages of gum a day.

Two briefly were checked into psychiatric wards. One man cut off three of his fingers with an ax.

It could not be done today

Today, the experiment can be regarded as a case study of how much a person is willing to endure to stand up for one’s beliefs. And how much a researcher can ask someone to endure even if the result potentially could help millions.

“Here you are subjecting people to dramatic deprivation that really did cause them significant hardship,” said Sarah Tracy, a University of Oklahoma science history professor who is writing a biography of Keys.

The end result was a landmark examination of human starvation. The experiment is still consulted and cited by scientists, especially researchers studying eating disorders and the psychological impact of extreme hunger. It’s valued for its scientific rigor and because there is nothing else like it.

“Clearly, the experiment could not be done today,” said Henry Blackburn, an emeritus professor at the U who worked with Keys after the starvation experiment.

Blackburn, who took over as director of Keys’ Laboratory of Physiological Hygiene after Keys retired, said the starvation experiment met the ethical standards of the day.

But the experiment wouldn’t pass the current rules regarding fully informed consent and the welfare of test subjects, according to Blackburn.

“They were harmed temporarily,” he said.

In interviews in the years after the experiment, test subjects have said they were glad to have been chosen for the test and proud that they had participated.

During WWII, conscientious objectors who refused to be drafted into the military were put in something called the Civilian Public Service and assigned to work camps to do “work of national importance.” The work ranged from fighting forest fires to being attendants in mental institutions.

Conscientious objectors also were given the opportunity to be “guinea pigs” in medical experiments studying conditions such as malaria, typhus and pneumonia.

Keys sought volunteers for the starvation experiment with a pamphlet sent to the work camps around the country. The pamphlet had a picture of small children looking into empty bowls with a headline, “Will you starve that they be better fed?”

‘I wanted to risk my life’

Peacock was one of more than 400 young men who applied to be starved.

“It appeared to me as something more important to do than anything else I had been doing before the war,” said Peacock, a Quaker originally from Indiana. He now lives in Honolulu.

Conscientious objector Robert Villwock did road work in a public service camp in Virginia before he volunteered for the Minnesota experiment.

Villwock, of White Bear Lake, died in 2010. His widow, Dorothy Villwock, said that when her husband decided to become a conscientious objector, “His father was embarrassed and went around to the neighbors and apologized.”

“They were frustrated, the men in these camps, because they felt they weren’t doing really important work,” Dorothy Villwock said.

Author Tucker said the volunteers were idealistic and typically motivated by religious beliefs. They also were young men who wanted to prove their toughness at a time when conscientious objectors, or “conchies” as they were called in newspaper headlines, were suspected of being slackers or cowards.

“These guys all fought to be in the experiment,” Tucker said. “They considered themselves lucky to be in the experiment.”

“I wanted to do something that had a little more punch to it. I wanted to risk my life in some way and be of service,” said starvation volunteer Marshall Sutton, 96, a Quaker now living in Maryland. “I wanted to do something that was more adventurous.”

The experiment began Nov. 19, 1944. The 36 volunteers, with an average age of 25, were housed and tested in windowless rooms in Keys’ laboratory under the bleachers at Memorial Stadium.

The recruiting pamphlet said the volunteers would have access to an array of cultural activities in the Twin Cities and could take classes at a “School of Foreign Relief,” so they could “study as you starve.”

The pamphlet also noted the presence of a women’s dorm on campus “for those among us who are so extraordinarily versatile as to combine the qualities of a ‘guinea pig’ by day and a ‘wolf’ by night!”

Calories cut in half

Keys later would write that when the experiment began, there was a briefing “stressing the point that they were in for a hard time. All of them said they understood.”

“I was told, boy, this is going to be difficult,” Peacock remembered. “The general purpose of the experiment was pretty clearly understood.”

First, there was a three-month control period when the men received a normal diet of about 3,200 calories a day while researchers tested their strength, endurance, dexterity, hearing, sight, intelligence, personalities and even the potency of their semen.

“We were given some test every day of some kind,” Sutton said.

The tests continued when the six-month semi-starvation period began. But now, the calories were cut almost in half.

Instead of bacon, eggs, roast beef, mashed potatoes, gravy and chocolate sundaes, the men were fed twice a day from a monotonous menu believed to be similar to what many Europeans were trying to live on: bread, cabbage, rutabagas, turnips and macaroni.

Initially, the researchers “trusted us a little bit too much in the experiment,” Sutton said.

He said some of the test subjects were given jobs cleaning the dining room where the football players ate. The guinea pigs asked for different work because it was too tempting to eat the scraps left behind.

In addition to part-time work, the men were required to walk 22 miles a week.

Cheating incidents led the researchers to institute a “buddy system” requiring that the test subjects never leave the laboratory alone so they could help each other resist breaking the diet.

“I was tempted, of course,” Sutton said. “I did everything I could to keep my mind in order. I took upon it as a religious exercise.”

‘It changed our personalities’

The men eventually would would lose about 25 percent of their weight, dropping from an average of about 153 pounds to about 116 pounds.

Their hair fell out. Their skin roughened. Their hearts shrank in size, and their pulse rates dropped. They constantly felt cold. They found it uncomfortable to sit on hard surfaces. Some men collapsed during treadmill endurance tests.

Oddly, their hearing improved, an apparent confirmation of an old belief that hunger sharpens the senses.

But they felt like tired old men, irritated when they saw researchers climb stairs two steps at a time. They became withdrawn, humorless and possessive about their food.

“You not only lose vitality, you lose the camaraderie we had as a group,” Peacock said.

“It changed our personalities,” Sutton said. “We were always apologizing to each other for something we didn’t mean to do.”

They often finished their meals by licking their plates. They began to view normal-weight people as obese.

“I’m so hungry I could eat anything, but I’d start on the fat staff first,” one test subject wrote.

“We had periods of elation. Periods of deep depression. And our difficult traits came to the surface,” Sutton said.

He remembers that he lost interest in sex. When his girlfriend came to visit him, he took her out to dinner at a nice restaurant in Minneapolis just so he could watch her enjoy it. But when the food came, the girlfriend refused to eat.

“At the time, I felt a little upset with her. I paid good money for that meal,” Sutton said.

Even after the six-month semi-starvation period was over, the men couldn’t eat whatever they wanted. They continued to live in the laboratory for a three-month rehabilitation period while the researchers divided them into groups to see how different recovery diets worked.

“It was hard. For a year, they couldn’t take a mouthful of food that hadn’t been measured and weighed,” Dorothy Villwock said.

The experiment showed that adding vitamins or protein wasn’t crucial to recovery. Starving men simply needed to get more calories.

The day that all restrictions were lifted in late October 1945, “most of us had something planned out. Dan and I had our eye on a smorgasbord,” Peacock said of another test subject.

But Peacock said the two men bought food to go from the Minneapolis restaurant. They wanted to eat it in the lab “in case we overdid it, someone would be there to take care of us.”

Sutton traveled back home to the East Coast after the experiment and remembers having a couple of milkshakes every time the bus stopped.

The complete results of the study were documented in 1950 in a two-volume, 1,385-page work titled “The Biology of Human Starvation.”

But earlier summaries of the findings from the Minnesota experiment were published in an effort to help post-war relief efforts.

“Men and Hunger: a Psychological Manual for Relief Workers,” for example, advised that when dealing with starving people, “Never forget that anything related to food should be handled with respect and reverence.”

‘My protruding ribs were my battle scars’

Keys kept in touch with his former guinea pigs, who would become ministers and academics and relief workers after the experiment.

“He was impressed with them and their careers and their willingness to endure this,” said Keys’ daughter, Carrie D’Andrea.

After the war, Sutton did relief work for the American Friends Service Committee, distributing food to refugees in the Gaza strip.

“It made me sensitive to people who didn’t have enough food,” Sutton said of his year as a guinea pig.

Test subject Henry Scholberg made two trips to Poland for the United Nations, transporting livestock as a “sea-going cowboy.” He later became a professor and director of the Ames Library of South Asia at the University of Minnesota.

Another volunteer, Max Kampelman, finished his law degree at the U, worked as an aide for Hubert Humphrey and became a diplomat and arms-control negotiator for the Carter and Reagan administrations.

The test subjects returned Keys’ admiration and respect. They invited him and the other researchers to their reunions.

“I had a feeling this was an impressive group of men. Not that they were rich and famous,” said Dorothy Villwock, who attended the 50th reunion. “But this was an impressive group as far as their character.”

D’Andrea also was at that reunion. She said none of the test subjects were overweight, but some of the men admitted they always carried a candy bar with them.

They looked back at what they had endured with gratitude and a sense of accomplishment.

“I am proud of what I did. My protruding ribs were my battle scars,” Scholberg is quoted as saying in the study publication. “It was something great, something incomprehensible.”

Keys’ starvation laboratory, dubbed “the cage,” was torn down with the rest of Memorial Stadium in 1992. Keys died 10 years ago this week. He lived to 100.

Peacock said he would volunteer to starve again “provided that I would be that age again. I’m not about to do it at 95.”

Sutton said he’s always loved food. But now he’s almost blind. He depends on a walker and hearing aids. And in the past year, he said, he hasn’t eaten as much as he used to.

“My hunger is receding right now,” he said.